<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="weebly" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >

<channel><title><![CDATA[JFA Brisbane &gt;&lt; Private Investigators - Blog]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/blog.html]]></link><description><![CDATA[Blog]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:35:37 +1000</pubDate><generator>Weebly</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Missing Persons  -  Runaways]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2011/07/missing-persons-runaways.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2011/07/missing-persons-runaways.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:22:32 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2011/07/missing-persons-runaways.html</guid><description><![CDATA[I frequently get inquiries from people looking for help on locating a missing child.&nbsp; Often the missing person is over 16 years of age, so they are deemed to be an adult in the eyes of the law.&nbsp; In most cases police can't assist at all so a private investigator is contacted.If the missing person refuses contact with their family / friends, it can be an extremely emotional and difficult situation.&nbsp;  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">I frequently get inquiries from people looking for help on locating a missing child.&nbsp; Often the missing person is over 16 years of age, so they are deemed to be an adult in the eyes of the law.&nbsp; In most cases police can't assist at all so a private investigator is contacted.<br /><br />If the missing person refuses contact with their family / friends, it can be an extremely emotional and difficult situation.&nbsp; <br /><br />I was recently contacted by the sister of a missing person, who was an "adult" male.&nbsp; He had been missing for over 5 weeks, refused all contact (in fact he had changed his mobile number) and his sister and mother were very concerned about his welfare.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><br />Here are my thoughts on this type of situation.<br /><span></span><br /></div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Locating someone who does not want to be located is extremely difficult - and therefore also costly.&nbsp; Someone living with friends, shared accommodation, in shelters, etc., can't be found by database searches alone.&nbsp; It requires investigation time - either by phone and/or by physically going to talk to people.&nbsp; <br /><br />2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; These types of matters usually take a great deal of time and, unfortunately, there is no guarantee of success.&nbsp; Someone constantly moving from place to place makes it even harder.<br /><br />3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If the missing person can be located, you might get some brief satisfaction knowing they are okay.&nbsp; But, if they then move on again, you will be in exactly the same situation you were in originally.&nbsp; <br /><br />In such a case, you need to understand you might initially be spending a great deal of money (possibly up to several thousands of dollars) to locate him or her, then have to repeat this should they again go missing.&nbsp; Obviously this would be an unsustainable situation.<br /><br />4.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; As concerned as you might be about the missing person's welfare, if they are an adult they can chose whether they wish to maintain contact with you are not.&nbsp; As selfish as this might be, it is (unfortunately) their choice.&nbsp; Police usually cannot take any action in this type of situation and the missing person cannot be forced to do something they don't want to do.&nbsp; <br /><br />Despite the above, whether a private investigator is enlisted to assist or not, it is important for you to give the missing person your <font style="text-decoration: underline;" size="2">unconditional</font> support should they get in contact so that they know they have a safe and welcoming place to go should they need it - one free from recriminations.<br /><br /></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spyware and GPS tracking technology can help your partner cheat on you]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2011/07/spyware-and-gps-tracking-technology-can-help-your-partner-cheat-on-you.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2011/07/spyware-and-gps-tracking-technology-can-help-your-partner-cheat-on-you.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:54:58 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2011/07/spyware-and-gps-tracking-technology-can-help-your-partner-cheat-on-you.html</guid><description><![CDATA[When it comes to determining whether your partner is being unfaithful, PC and phone spyware can often be an invaluable tool.&nbsp; It will not always provide rock-solid and indisputable evidence of infidelity, regardless of how damning it might initially appear.&nbsp; For example, email or chat logs that go into explicit sexual content can be, and often are, explained away as just pure fantasy.&nbsp; "It was all just pretend stuff [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">When it comes to determining whether your partner is being unfaithful, PC and phone spyware can often be an invaluable tool.&nbsp; It will not always provide rock-solid and indisputable evidence of infidelity, regardless of how damning it might initially appear.&nbsp; For example, email or chat logs that go into explicit sexual content can be, and often are, explained away as just pure fantasy.&nbsp; "It was all just pretend stuff.&nbsp; It was just a fantasy thing.&nbsp; Nothing ever happened in real life.&nbsp; Honest."&nbsp; The main use of spyware in establishing whether infidelity is occurring is to help identify the other person and past or future events (times and locations) so that surveillance can be better targeted and video obtained to show how both people interact when together.&nbsp; Holding hands and kissing, then walking off into a motel is a whole lot harder to explain away than a few salacious emails. <br /><br />Okay, so spyware can be helpful when you need to determine whether your partner is cheating.&nbsp; But, there's another take on the use of spyware that seems to be becoming more prevalent these days.&nbsp; <br /><br />Over the past few months, I've been contacted by a number of people looking to use spyware to help them determine whether their partner is becoming suspicious of their infidelity.&nbsp; <br /><br /></div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="font-weight: bold;">PC and phone spyware can reveal:</span><br /><br /><ol style=""><li style="">Whether you are visiting any P.I. web sites.</li><li style="">If you are calling an investigation agency.</li><li style="">If you are using Google to find out what the signs of a cheating partner are.</li><li style="">Whether you might be emailing a friend and outlining your concerns about your partner.</li></ol><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">How to protect yourself from possible spyware on your phone or PC.</span><br /><br /><ol style=""><li style="">Don't  call a P.I. agency from your mobile phone.&nbsp; Only call a P.I. on a local  phone number from a landline phone.&nbsp; Local calls usually are not  itemised on your phone bill.&nbsp; Yes, your phone line could be bugged, but  it's a whole lot harder listening to potentially hours of phone  conversations than it is to Google a phone number to see who that number  belongs to.&nbsp; </li><li style="">If you are concerned your mobile phone might have  spyware, ask the agency to provide you with a number that isn't  advertised anywhere - one that can't be traced.</li><li style="">Deleting your website browsing history is not enough.&nbsp; Modern PC spyware will identify all websites visited.</li><li style="">Creating  a new Gmail, Hotmail or Yahoo email address that your partner isn't  aware of also won't help.&nbsp; If spyware is on the PC you are using, all  the emails you send and receive will be recorded.</li></ol><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">GPS tracking devices</span><br /><br />Just as spyware can help your partner get away with being unfaithful, so can GPS tracking technology.<br /><br /><ol><li>Where is my partner right now?</li><li>Are they on the way home?&nbsp; </li><li>Are they still where they said they would be?&nbsp; </li></ol><br />GPS  tracking devices are now plentiful and inexpensive.&nbsp; They can very  easily be hidden in or on a vehicle and can monitor your vehicle's every  location.&nbsp; Most people do not go too far from their cars and this can  be used against you.&nbsp; This too is another reason you shouldn't be a DIY  investigator.<br /><br />So, with all this spyware and GPS tracking  technology, is all lost?&nbsp; Not at all.&nbsp; In fact, not in the slightest.&nbsp;  If you suspect your partner might be going to these length to hide their  infidelity, their methods can actually make detecting their infidelity  all the easier.&nbsp; Just as "misinformation" worked extremely well in  wartime and political / commercial spying operations, so too can your  partner's behaviour be turned against him or her. <br /><br />But, you will  need professional advice.&nbsp; Contact me (see the safety tips above) and I  would be happy to discuss your particular situation with you.</div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[So you think you might like to become a private investigator? ]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2010/03/so-you-think-you-might-like-to-become-a-private-investigator.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2010/03/so-you-think-you-might-like-to-become-a-private-investigator.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:44:18 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2010/03/so-you-think-you-might-like-to-become-a-private-investigator.html</guid><description><![CDATA[I get on average two or three calls a week from people interested in becoming a private investigator.When I get these calls, I have fixed feelings. &nbsp;I certainly don&rsquo;t want to discourage someone who has done a little homework about the profession and genuinely feels they might have the capabilities of becoming a good investigator.&nbsp; When I get a call from someone like this, I&rsquo;m quite hap [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">I get on average two or three calls a week from people interested in becoming a private investigator.<br /><br />When I get these calls, I have fixed feelings. &nbsp;<br /><br />I certainly don&rsquo;t want to discourage someone who has done a little homework about the profession and genuinely feels they might have the capabilities of becoming a good investigator.&nbsp; When I get a call from someone like this, I&rsquo;m quite happy to chat to them about investigation work and give them some insights.<br /><br />On the other hand, I also wonder whether the caller has just watched a Magnum PI re-run on TV or read a spy thriller.&nbsp; Then, on impulse they decide to call a PI to find out more because it all looks and sounds really exciting.&nbsp; Usually, for this type of caller, it&rsquo;s turns out to be just a waste of my time.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The excitement factor</span><br /><br />Is PI work exciting? &nbsp;<br /><br />My usual answer is, no. &nbsp;<br /><br />There can be occasions when you will get a rush of adrenaline, such as when conducting a surveillance assignment, or get a great deal of satisfaction in finally being able to uncover some critical evidence in a very complex matter, but generally investigation work is tedious and boring.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Surely following someone around on surveillance isn&rsquo;t boring? &nbsp;<br /><br />Okay, following someone around isn&rsquo;t boring, in fact, it can be quite exciting.&nbsp; But, surveillance work is not all about the surveillance subject being active. &nbsp;<br /><br />Surveillance work is generally 90% inactivity and 10% activity.&nbsp; So, for every ten hours of surveillance, you will spend 9 hours doing nothing but watching and waiting for some sort of activity. &nbsp;<br /><br />Are you really ready for that kind of boredom?<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Only one person in 10 will make it past the first 12 months as a surveillance investigator</span><br />.<br /></div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">Over the past 23 years, I&rsquo;ve lectured on surveillance techniques to a lot of aspiring investigators.&nbsp; Based on that experience, I&rsquo;ve found that, of ten people who have gone to the trouble and expense of taking a course on surveillance, only one person will still be working as a surveillance investigator after 12 months.<br /><br />Why is that?&nbsp; For one thing, surveillance work can be extremely demanding physically.&nbsp; For example, spending 10 hours in a car in one spot in the middle of summer isn&rsquo;t the average person&rsquo;s idea of fun. &nbsp;<br /><br />Then there is a very large skill-set that needs to be leaned and perfected.&nbsp; Despite only one in ten people actually staying in this industry, there seems to be no shortage of people who still want to become surveillance investigators and the competition is usually fierce. &nbsp;<br /><br />Most surveillance investigators work on a sub-contract basis, which usually means the better you are, the more work you will get and the more money you earn. &nbsp;<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The skills required to become a good surveillance investigator</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Driving skills</span><br /><br />Your driving skills need to be top notch.&nbsp; This doesn&rsquo;t just mean being prepared to drive fast, far from it.&nbsp; You need to be able to &ldquo;read&rdquo; the traffic around you and the surveillance subject, ideally place at least one vehicle between you and the subject whenever possible, yet still be able to stay with the subject if he decides to go through a yellow traffic light and the driver between you and the subject wants to stop. &nbsp;<br /><br />There is a real art in being able to follow someone undetected, particularly over long distances.&nbsp; Training and practice will go a long way to getting there, but I believe there is also some innate skill involved and some people just never acquire that skill.&nbsp; Losing a surveillance subject will cost you money and work.&nbsp; Lose then too often and you will need to look for another line of work.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Video</span><br /><br />Being able to take good, clear and steady video that targets the subject matter appropriately is another critical skill.&nbsp;&nbsp; Again, it can be learned but the really good investigators I&rsquo;ve seen seem to have a knack for getting good video.<br /><br />Video isn&rsquo;t just taken from behind tinted windows whilst sitting in a car.&nbsp; If your surveillance subject is out and about say, attending a shopping centre, you also need to be able to take good covert video and remain totally undetected. &nbsp;<br /><br />You <span style="text-decoration: underline;">will</span> be rated on the amount of video you are able to take.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">PC and writing skills</span><br /><br />Every investigator I know hates paperwork.&nbsp; But, it is an essential part of this profession. &nbsp;<br /><br />If you don&rsquo;t know how to use MS Word and Excel, you will need to learn first.&nbsp; Being able to receive instructions and send your reports via email is also essential.<br /><br />If you can&rsquo;t string a grammatically correct sentence together (with correct spelling), you will also need to learn this skill.&nbsp; Many investigation agencies include the surveillance operative&rsquo;s field notes with their covering reports when they report to their client. &nbsp;<br /><br />You <span style="text-decoration: underline;">will</span> be judged on the quality of your surveillance notes. &nbsp;<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Droughts and floods</span><br /><br />Working as a sub-contractor usually means there will be times when you just can&rsquo;t handle all the work you are offered.&nbsp; There will also be times when you simply aren&rsquo;t getting all the work you would like.&nbsp; This does tend to be a cyclic industry and you will need to be able to cope with that, both emotionally and financially.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Availability</span><br /><br />The more available you make yourself, the more work you will get.&nbsp; This means sometime starting very early and finishing very late.&nbsp; Being prepared to work nights, weekends and public holidays is essential. &nbsp;<br /><br />Your domestic life will definitely suffer.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Operating a business</span><br /><br />As a sub-contractor, you will also need to learn how to run a small business.&nbsp; This means making sure all your licensing and insurance cover is up to date, you are fully tax compliant, have an ABN (registering the GST is up to you) and have at least some basic bookkeeping skills &ndash; unless you want to pay a professional to do that for you.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Background and training</span><br /><br />A lot of private investigators come from a police background, but this is by no means a requirement.&nbsp; Yes, it is an advantage to some degree, but a lot of the methods and practices used by police will need to be re-learned to accommodate a commercial environment.&nbsp; Government services are run very differently to private enterprise.<br /><br />A lot of investigation work is done on behalf of the legal profession and the insurance industry, so a background in law or insurance would also be an advantage.&nbsp; But, again, it isn&rsquo;t a requirement.&nbsp;&nbsp; Some of the best surveillance investigators I know don&rsquo;t have a police, legal or insurance background.<br /><br />Undertaking an approved training course is now a prerequisite to becoming licensed as a private investigator in Australia.&nbsp; However, whilst many training organisation do a fair job of teaching skills associated with doing certain tasks within this industry, they usually don&rsquo;t teach the skills associated with being successful in this industry. &nbsp;<br /><br />There is a vast array of information you will need to learn to be successful in this profession and it is the sum of this information that will define your level of professionalism.&nbsp; No training organisation will teach you this.&nbsp; You must learn it through experience, experimentation and self-study.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Specialising in one field</span><br /><br />Whilst surveillance work is usually part and parcel of most investigation agency workloads, there are numerous other areas of specialisation an investigator might branch out into. &nbsp;<br /><br />Insurance related work can encompass a myriad of different areas and specialities.&nbsp; Some investigators specialise exclusively on conducting only accident investigations.&nbsp; This might involve attending the location of an accident (usually well after it has happened) taking photographs, measurements (and later preparing a scale plan of the area), as well as interviewing witnesses, taking formal statements, obtaining relevant documentation and preparing a final report. &nbsp;<br /><br />Other investigators take on a more general role as a &ldquo;Factual Investigator&rdquo;.&nbsp; This might mean they don&rsquo;t limit themselves to just one type of insurance matter, but take on a number of different types of claim types, such as liability claims, workplace accident investigations, general insurance claims (burglaries, stolen motor vehicles, etc.) or income protection claims.&nbsp; Then there are fire claims, marine accidents, product liabilities matters... the list goes on and on.<br /><br />Good analytical, interviewing and report writing skills are all critical.&nbsp; This is definitely an area of work where a legal or police background will be of great assistance. &nbsp;<br /><br />Factual investigators might also take on criminal defence work &ndash; again a legal or police background is almost essential.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Starting your own agency</span><br /><br />My advice is, if you don&rsquo;t already have a minimum of three years of investigation experience in at least one particular field, do not put yourself out there and market that service/s to the public.&nbsp;&nbsp; Personally, I believe this should be a legislated requirement.&nbsp; But, in Queensland at least, it isn&rsquo;t.<br /><br />Starting your own private investigation agency sounds great doesn&rsquo;t it?&nbsp; Do a few courses, get licensed, set up a web site, get some business cards printed and go make some money.&nbsp; Great in theory, but I have a huge problem with inexperienced people doing that.&nbsp; You are not only doing yourself a huge personal disservice, but you are also inflicting your inexperience onto the general public.&nbsp; It certainly won&rsquo;t enhance the public&rsquo;s perception of this industry.<br /><br />Unless you&rsquo;ve worked very closely with an experienced agency owner during those initial three years (and also learned all you can about the various facets of running an agency), you will definitely flounder.&nbsp; You might not fail in the long run, but you will hit a lot of hurdles.&nbsp; I did, but things were a lot different 23 years ago.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s even harder these days.<br /><br />At the very least, you will need a mentor prepared to be on call and provide advice on an as needed basis. &nbsp;<br /><br />Being a good investigator doesn&rsquo;t mean you can run a successful investigation agency.&nbsp; Running a successful business requires a completely different skill-set.<br /><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">.</span><br /></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="font-weight: bold;">Video #1</span> - Anyone looking at getting into the investigation industry should definitely watch the following video.&nbsp; Whilst it is from an American source, it does provide some extremely valuable insights.&nbsp; Length - 10 minutes.<br /></div>  <div  style=" margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; "><div style="text-align: left;"><object width='350' height='289'><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OpeuIQ49218"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allownetworking" value="internal"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OpeuIQ49218" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allownetworking="internal" wmode="transparent" width='350' height='289'></embed></object></div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Video #2</span> - Here's another video you should watch.&nbsp; Again, it's American but the speaker does make some good point about the realities of becoming a PI.&nbsp; Length - 9 minutes.<br /></div>  <div  style=" margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; "><div style="text-align: left;"><object width='350' height='289'><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/w6mF1aa9NfE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allownetworking" value="internal"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/w6mF1aa9NfE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allownetworking="internal" wmode="transparent" width='350' height='289'></embed></object></div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><br />More information on obtaining a Private Investigator licence in Qld is available from the following website<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.fairtrading.qld.gov.au/private-investigator.htm"><span style="font-weight: bold;">http://</span></a><a style="font-weight: bold;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fairtrading.qld.gov.au/private-investigator.htm">www.fairtrading.qld.gov.au/private-investigator.htm</a><br /><br /><br />Still with me at this point?&nbsp; Congratulations!&nbsp; I&rsquo;d be very happy to answer any questions you might have.<br /><br /><a href="mailto:jarris@jfabrisbane.com"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Send me an email</span></a><br /></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Murder or suicide - probably the strangest true crime story you will read]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/10/murder-or-suicide-probably-the-strangest-true-crime-story-you-will-read.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/10/murder-or-suicide-probably-the-strangest-true-crime-story-you-will-read.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:54:17 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/10/murder-or-suicide-probably-the-strangest-true-crime-story-you-will-read.html</guid><description><![CDATA[1994's Most Bizarre SuicideAt the 1994 annual awards dinner given by the American Association for Forensic Sciences, AAFS President Don Harper Mills astounded his audience in San Diego with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story...On March 23 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a gunshot wound of the head caused by a shotgun.Investigation  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">1994's Most Bizarre Suicide<br /><br />At the 1994 annual awards dinner given by the American Association for Forensic Sciences, AAFS President Don Harper Mills astounded his audience in San Diego with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story...<br /><br />On March 23 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a gunshot wound of the head caused by a shotgun.<br /><br />Investigation to that point had revealed that the decedent had jumped from the top of a ten story building with the intent to commit suicide. (He left a note indicating his despondency.) As he passed the 9th floor on the way down, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast through a window, killing him instantly. Neither the shooter nor the decedent was aware that a safety net had been erected at the 8th floor level to protect some window washers, and that the decedent would not have been able to complete his intent to commit suicide because of this...<br /></div><div ><!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div><div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; "><br />Ordinarily a person who starts into motion the events with a suicide intent ultimately commits suicide even though the mechanism might be not what he intended. That he was shot on the way to certain death nine stories below probably would not change his mode of death from suicide to homicide, but the fact that his suicide intent would not have been achieved under any circumstance caused the medical examiner to feel that he had homicide on his hands...<br /><br />Further investigation led to the discovery that the room on the 9th floor from whence the shotgun blast emanated was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. He was threatening her with the shotgun because of an interspousal spat and became so upset that he could not hold the shotgun straight.<br /><br />Therefore, when he pulled the trigger, he completely missed his wife, and the pellets went through the window, striking the decedent.<br /><br />When one intends to kill subject A, but kills subject B in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject B. The old man was confronted with this conclusion, but both he and his wife were adamant in stating that neither knew that the shotgun was loaded. It was the longtime habit of the old man to threaten his wife with an unloaded shotgun. He had no intent to murder her; therefore, the killing of the decedent appeared then to be accident.<br /><br />That is, the gun had been accidentally loaded...<br /><br />But further investigation turned up a witness that their son was seen loading the shotgun approximately six weeks prior to the fatal accident.<br /><br />That investigation showed that the mother (the old lady) had cut off her son's financial support, and her son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that the father would shoot his mother. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus...<br /><br />Further investigation revealed that the son became increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to get his mother murdered. This led him to jump off the ten story building on March 23, only to be killed by a shotgun blast through a 9th story window.<br /><br />The medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The best way to help your investigator on a private/domestic matter – and perhaps save yourself some money.]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/09/the-best-way-to-help-your-investigator-on-a-privatedomestic-matter-and-perhaps-save-yourself-some-money.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/09/the-best-way-to-help-your-investigator-on-a-privatedomestic-matter-and-perhaps-save-yourself-some-money.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:00:00 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/09/the-best-way-to-help-your-investigator-on-a-privatedomestic-matter-and-perhaps-save-yourself-some-money.html</guid><description><![CDATA[A lot of investigators don&rsquo;t provide private or domestic investigation services. By private/domestic matters I&rsquo;m referring to infidelity or cheating partners, child custody and other Family Law matters, pre-nuptial checks, divorce litigation support or child activity surveillance.Ever wonder why that is?These types of private matters are often highly emotional situations for the client. When someone is having [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">A lot of investigators don&rsquo;t provide private or domestic investigation services. By private/domestic matters I&rsquo;m referring to infidelity or cheating partners, child custody and other Family Law matters, pre-nuptial checks, divorce litigation support or child activity surveillance.<br /><br />Ever wonder why that is?<br /><br />These types of private matters are often highly emotional situations for the client. When someone is having a personal crisis and they turn to an investigator to obtain information or &ldquo;peace of mind&rdquo;, that investigator is often the only person with whom they feel comfortable sharing this information. There is often an &ldquo;unburdening of the soul&rdquo; and a great avalanche of information is provided, particularly at the first meeting.</div><div ><!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div><div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; "><br />This is very understandable and I am always fully prepared to have an extended first meeting with a client in such a position. I am usually genuinely sympathetic to their situation and appreciate the emotional turmoil they must be going through. I am fully prepared to listen to all they have to say as this provides two distinct advantages. Firstly, it often is quite therapeutic for the client. Secondly, it provides me with a good understanding of the client&rsquo;s situation, their motivation for hiring an investigator, and their expected outcomes. It also provides me with some information about how to best obtain the desired information in the most cost effective manner.<br /><br />However, as the matter progresses, it is often the ongoing and constant emotion-charged information the client continues to discuss with the investigator that causes the most concern. Some clients start to view the investigator as a sounding board for sometimes minor matters and they will often consume a great deal of the investigator&rsquo;s time talking about events and situations that have no real benefit to the investigation. Often a sympathetic investigator is seen as a &ldquo;friend&rdquo; who shares the same interests and concerns as the client. I recently was woken late at night by a call from a client who wanted to tell me that their spouse had only just arrived home from having to &ldquo;work&rdquo; late. Obviously, this is very relevant to the client as it provides another ground for suspicion, but it is certainly something that could have waited until a more respectful hour. Yes, an investigator has to often be available for matters outside of general business hours, but these should be reserved for urgent matters.<br /><br />Most investigators will be sympathetic to their client&rsquo;s situation &ndash; but only up to a point. When a client becomes obsessive in discussing every single event, or constantly asking for life advice, one of two things will occur. The investigator will either cease the relationship, or will charge the client a premium for the extra time involved.<br /><br />Anyone who engages a private investigator needs to understand the investigator will view their relationship on a business level and nothing more. This is absolutely crucial as the investigator needs to stay focussed on the facts of the matter, maintain an unbiased view and not become embroiled in the emotions of the situation.<br /><br />The more business-like a client can be in their dealings with an investigator, the better. The investigator can get on with doing his or her job at minimum cost to the client.<br /><br />Jarris Fuller <br />August 2009</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Larger agencies -v- smaller agencies]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/08/larger-agencies-v-smaller-agencies.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/08/larger-agencies-v-smaller-agencies.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:00:00 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/08/larger-agencies-v-smaller-agencies.html</guid><description><![CDATA[There is an increasing trend by insurers to use a lesser number of investigation agencies and rely on large (often national) agencies for the conduct of their work. WorkCover Queensland recently reduced their investigation panel members from six to three. Whereas there was previously several smaller firms that provided specialised surveillance services exclusively, the three selected large national firms now provide both surveillance and factua [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">There is an increasing trend by insurers to use a lesser number of investigation agencies and rely on large (often national) agencies for the conduct of their work. WorkCover Queensland recently reduced their investigation panel members from six to three. Whereas there was previously several smaller firms that provided specialised surveillance services exclusively, the three selected large national firms now provide both surveillance and factual investigations.<br /><br />No doubt there are logistical and other corporate reasons for choosing to go the &ldquo;lesser and bigger&rdquo; route.&nbsp; But it does make me wonder whether this will, in time, be seen to have been the correct decision.&nbsp; In fact, several large insurers have started to reverse their policies in this regard.&nbsp; Whilst there will always be some degree of variation in the quality of service that any agency produces, a common theme I have been hearing is that the larger firms seem to have a somewhat &ldquo;sausage factory&rdquo; mentality.&nbsp; Get the job in, done and back with little apparent regard for results or quality of service.<br /><br />Maybe I&rsquo;m wrong, but being &ldquo;all things, to all people, everywhere&rdquo; seems like an extremely difficult business model to achieve and an even harder one to maintain. <br /><br />I&rsquo;ve given some recent thought to what the pros and cons are to choosing a larger firm over a smaller one.</div><div ><!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div><div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">The first potential Pro would have to be that larger firms have more resources at their disposal.&nbsp; A larger firm has bigger premises (but this also means added overheads), more administration staff (again, more costs) and they cover a larger geographical area, with several having national coverage.<br /><br />Let&rsquo;s have a closer look at a larger agency&rsquo;s expansive geographical coverage.&nbsp; Larger agencies mainly use investigation personnel on a sub-contract basis who also operate their own separate businesses and who might even have their own clients.&nbsp; Not very many are employees of a larger agency &ndash; they can&rsquo;t afford to be because the volume of work just isn&rsquo;t there, particularly in regional areas.&nbsp; So you have a one or two person team in a regional area that charge a certain fee structure to their own clients, but who are also on a lower rate when taking on work for a large PI agency to fill in on the quiet times.<br /><br />Which clients do you think the regional operators would give a priority to?&nbsp; Would this priority go to their direct clients at a higher rate, or a large PI agency at a lower rate?&nbsp; Which jobs would be more important to them? <br /><br />Let's look at another &ldquo;resources&rdquo; issue; that of more and/or better equipment.&nbsp; Again, most agencies (both the smaller operators and the larger ones) engage sub-contract surveillance (and factual) investigators who all have their own equipment.&nbsp; This includes camcorders and other covert video systems, plus suitably disguised surveillance vehicles.&nbsp; There isn&rsquo;t much more a surveillance operative needs to conduct effective surveillance.<br /><br />What about all that great equipment back at the agency?&nbsp; It might come as a bit of a surprise, but all you need is a PC to prepare a report and the equipment to get the exposed video onto a DVD.&nbsp; Most agencies will also prepare video-print photos off the DVD to be included in the report.&nbsp; $1,500 to $2,000 would more than adequately cover that set-up as a basic cost.&nbsp; You can pay for and get fancy &ldquo;fluff&rdquo; material like glossy DVD covers, but I suspect most clients are more interested in the actual evidence obtained, not the &ldquo;look&rdquo; of the package it&rsquo;s in.<br /><br />Another possible Pro is that a larger agency has the financial resources to design and implement written guidelines and standard operating procedures to hopefully achieve a more consistent result.&nbsp; Many are even ISO compliant.&nbsp; On a side-issue, they certainly have the most financial resources to &ldquo;throw&rdquo; at a tender and it seems to me that often a tender decision will be made on who can dot the most &ldquo;I&rdquo;s and cross the most &ldquo;T&rdquo;s.&nbsp; Is this really the best way to pick a service provider?<br /><br />When you compare a large agency (which has a large number of individual personnel in place to deal with each component of the matter in hand) to a smaller agency that might employ one or two people to do exactly the same job, a great deal of inefficiency becomes evident.<br /><br />In a large agency, the receptionist will take the initial call and perhaps transfer the call through to the surveillance manager.&nbsp; This is usually an employee.&nbsp; Compare talking to an employee with that of speaking to the actual owner of the business - who is usually involved in the day to day hands-on investigation/surveillance work as well.&nbsp; I&rsquo;m not saying an employee doesn&rsquo;t care about your inquiry, but the business owner&rsquo;s actual livelihood depends on maintaining good quality client services so they will continue to get additional work.&nbsp; It simply means more to him or her.<br /><br />It is also extremely difficult for the surveillance manager at a large national agency to have detailed knowledge of each matter being handled by that firm &ndash; a larger agency might have fifty or more matters on their books at any given time.&nbsp; When there is an inquiry about a particular matter, the surveillance manager will usually have to find out what&rsquo;s been happening and call back.<br /><br />On the other hand, the owner of a smaller agency which might be handling say, a dozen matters at a time, would probably be familiar with each and every matter.&nbsp; He&rsquo;s probably worked on a lot of them personally and can give you an update on the matter straight away.&nbsp; If you need an urgent answer, a smaller firm will be far better placed to provide one quicker than a larger firm.<br /><br />An argument could be made that a larger agency provides better overall results.&nbsp; As mentioned above, &ldquo;&hellip;a larger agency has the financial resources to design and implement written guidelines and standard operating procedures to achieve a more consistent result.&rdquo;&nbsp; But, here&rsquo;s the rub.&nbsp; Just how good are those &ldquo;consistent results?&rdquo;&nbsp; In both cases you have independent surveillance operatives conducting the majority of the work.&nbsp; However, with a smaller firm, you are also likely to have the principal actively involved in the hands-on surveillance work, or at the very least, he will be liaising regularly (usually daily) with the operatives conducting the work.&nbsp; His livelihood directly depends on obtaining consistent high-quality results.<br /><br />Let&rsquo;s look at it from the surveillance operative&rsquo;s perspective.&nbsp; He usually receives surveillance assignments by email and might get an initial telephone call from the surveillance manager at a large agency to discuss the matter.&nbsp; After that, contact with the larger firm is usually very limited.&nbsp; Sure, he will probably phone if there is a problem, but there is far less day to day communication between a surveillance operative and a larger firm than there is with a smaller firm.<br /><br />I want to know exactly what is happening on each of my jobs on a day to day basis and I want to be ready to provide advice or assistance if it is needed.&nbsp; Each and every job is important to me and all my operatives know that.&nbsp; I care about each job and I think that reflects back by them caring more about the job as well.<br /><br />In some cases, the surveillance manager at a large firm might simply be a full time administrator with limited or even no direct hands-on surveillance experience.&nbsp; There are some very good, experienced surveillance operatives working in this industry, but some matters can be quite complex or difficult and some guidance and assistance will often be needed.<br /><br />The larger the firm and the more people involved in the process, the easier it is for one person in that chain to overlook something important.&nbsp; Things simply &ldquo;fall between the cracks&rdquo; more in a large firm than a smaller one.<br /><br />Will the trend to use larger national firms continue, or will some of the more recent reversals of that trend continue to increase?&nbsp; I guess only time will tell. <br /><br />Jarris Fuller</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's nice when you can help someone out]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/08/its-nice-when-you-can-help-someone-out.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/08/its-nice-when-you-can-help-someone-out.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:00:00 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/08/its-nice-when-you-can-help-someone-out.html</guid><description><![CDATA[It's always nice when you can help someone out.&nbsp; This particular client needed to find someone quickly and one simple search conducted while the client was still on the phone got the information they needed.&nbsp; The search only cost me a few dollars and I was happy to help at no charge. When you then get such a nice email in return, it's thanks enough.&nbsp;  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">It's always nice when you can help someone out.&nbsp; This particular client needed to find someone quickly and one simple search conducted while the client was still on the phone got the information they needed.&nbsp; The search only cost me a few dollars and I was happy to help at no charge. <br /><br />When you then get such a nice email in return, it's thanks enough.&nbsp; </div><div ><!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div><div ><div style="text-align: center;"><a><img src="http://www.jfabrisbane.com/uploads/2/9/4/1/2941619/6598006.jpg?489x275" style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px; border-width:0;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px;"></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[History of the private investigator]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/07/first-post.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/07/first-post.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:00:00 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/07/first-post.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Was the first ever private investigation agency the "Pinkerton National Detective Agency" (established in the USA in 1850)?&nbsp; No.Was the first private investigation agency even an American agency?&nbsp; No.If you don't already known, the answer to both questions might surprise you.&nbsp; It surprised me.In 1833 Eug&egra [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">Was the first ever private investigation agency the "Pinkerton National Detective Agency" (established in the USA in 1850)?&nbsp; No.<br /><br />Was the first private investigation agency even an American agency?&nbsp; No.<br /><br />If you don't already known, the answer to both questions might surprise you.&nbsp; It surprised me.<br /></div><div ><!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div><div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">In 1833 Eug&egrave;ne Fran&ccedil;ois Vidocq, a French soldier, criminal and privateer, founded the first known private detective agency, "Le Bureau des Renseignements Universels pour le commerce et l'Industrie" ("The Office of Universal Information For Commerce and Industry") and hired ex-convicts. Official law enforcement tried many times to shut it down. In 1842 police arrested him in suspicion of unlawful imprisonment and taking money on false pretences after he had solved an embezzlement case. Vidocq later suspected that it had been a set-up. He was sentenced for five years with a 3,000-franc fine but the Court of Appeals released him. Vidocq is credited with having introduced record-keeping, criminology and ballistics to criminal investigation. He made the first plaster casts of shoe impressions. He created indelible ink and unalterable bond paper with his printing company. His form of anthropometrics is still partially used by French police. He is also credited for philanthropic pursuits &ndash; he claimed he never informed on anyone who had stolen for real need.<br /><br />After Vidocq, the industry was born. Much of what private investigators did in the early days was to act as the police in matters that their clients felt the police were not equipped for or willing to do. A larger role for this new private investigative industry to was to assist companies in labor disputes. Some early private investigators provided armed guards to act as a private militia.<br /><br />In the United Kingdom, the Hungarian, Ignatius Paul Pollaky, set up an agency in 1862. Although little remembered today, his fame at the time was such that he was mentioned in various books of the 1870s and immortalised as "Paddington" Pollaky for his "keen penetration" in the comic opera, Patience.<br /><br />In the U.S., the Pinkerton National Detective Agency was a private detective agency established in 1850 by Allan Pinkerton. Pinkerton had become famous when he foiled a plot to assassinate then President-Elect Abraham Lincoln. Pinkerton's agents performed services which ranged from undercover investigations and detection of crimes to plant protection and armed security. It is sometimes claimed, probably with exaggeration, that at the height of its existence the Pinkerton National Detective Agency employed more agents than the United States Army.<br /><br />During the labor unrest of the late 19th century, companies sometimes hired operatives and armed guards from the Pinkertons and similar agencies to keep strikers and suspected unionists out of their factories. The most famous example of this was the Homestead Strike of 1892, when industrialist Henry Clay Frick hired a large contingent of Pinkerton men to regain possession of Andrew Carnegie's steel mill during a lock-out at Homestead, Pennsylvania. Gunfire erupted between the strikers and the Pinkertons, resulting in multiple casualties and deaths on both sides. Several days later a radical anarchist, Alexander Berkman, attempted to assassinate Frick. In the aftermath of the Homestead Riot, several states passed so-called "anti-Pinkerton" laws restricting the importation of private security guards during labour strikes. The federal Anti-Pinkerton Act of 1893 continues to prohibit an "individual employed by the Pinkerton Detective Agency, or similar organisation" from being employed by "the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia."<br /><br />Pinkerton agents were also hired to track western outlaws Jesse James, the Reno brothers, and the Wild Bunch, including Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. The Pinkerton agency's logo, an eye embellished with the words "We Never Sleep," inspired the term "private eye."<br /><br />It was not until the prosperity of the 1920s that the private investigator became a person accessible to the average American. With the wealth of the 1920s and the expanding of the middle class came the need of middle America for private investigators.<br /><br />Since then the private detective industry has grown with the changing needs of the public. Social issues like infidelity and unionisation have impacted the industry and created new types of work, as has the need for insurance and, with it, insurance fraud, criminal defence investigations and the invention of low-cost listening devices. In a number of countries, a licensing process has been introduced that has put criteria in place that investigators have to meet: in most cases, a clean criminal record. This has combined with modern business practices that have ensured that most investigators are now professional in outlook, rather than seeing the PI world as a second career opportunity for retired policemen.</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Backpack likely saved the life of a PI]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/07/backpack-likely-saved-the-life-of-a-pi.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/07/backpack-likely-saved-the-life-of-a-pi.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:00:00 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/07/backpack-likely-saved-the-life-of-a-pi.html</guid><description><![CDATA[DENVER, CO. &ndash; A worker&rsquo;s compensation surveillance operative who was shot four times by someone he was watching last week likely survived only because he was wearing a backpack, according to a police affidavit.The shooter told police he thought he was firing at a bear. The surveillance operative said he&rsquo;d been "yelled at" by the shooter minutes before the shooting. The shooter is facing a charge of attempted first  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">DENVER, CO. &ndash; A worker&rsquo;s compensation surveillance operative who was shot four times by someone he was watching last week likely survived only because he was wearing a backpack, according to a police affidavit.<br /><br />The shooter told police he thought he was firing at a bear. The surveillance operative said he&rsquo;d been "yelled at" by the shooter minutes before the shooting. The shooter is facing a charge of attempted first degree murder.</div><div ><!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div><div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">In the affidavit, a Jefferson County sheriff&rsquo;s deputy wrote that he&rsquo;d been dispatched at 6 pm on August 4 to a road in the foothills southwest of Denver on a report of someone claiming he&rsquo;d been shot by someone firing a shotgun.<br><br>The operative &ndash; whose name is withheld here for his safety - told officers he was conducting an investigation regarding possible insurance fraud. Court records indicate he was working for Pinnacol Assurance, Colorado&rsquo;s largest worker&rsquo;s compensation insurance provider. It regularly retains private investigators to watch employees who have submitted worker&rsquo;s compensation claims, to try to obtain video documenting that the employee is not injured, not injured as severely as they claim, or not hampered by the injury in the way they claim.<br><br>The operative told sheriff&rsquo;s deputies he&rsquo;d been watching Marshall Lawson&rsquo;s residence from about 100 yards away. Somehow Lawson became aware of the operative&rsquo;s presence about three hours after the operative initiated surveillance. The operative says Lawson &ldquo;yelled at&rdquo; him, telling him he was going to get a gun.<br><br>The surveillance operative said that soon thereafter he saw Lawson return with a gun and aim it at him. He says he heard two shots. He says he then started running up a hill away from Lawson, and heard two more shots.<br><br>The operative told sheriff&rsquo;s deputies he couldn&rsquo;t get a signal on his cell phone, so he walked to his car, drove toward town, and called 911 as soon as his cell phone was in a coverage area. When he placed the call, he didn&rsquo;t think he&rsquo;d been hit by any bullets. But while he was waiting for police to respond, he found two bullet holes in the backpack he&rsquo;d been wearing, according to the affidavit.<br><br>Sheriff&rsquo;s deputies went to Marshall&rsquo;s residence and found three spent .22 caliber casings in the driveway, about 10 feet from the road. A fourth was found in a .22 caliber rifle recovered at the residence of one of Marshall&rsquo;s grandfathers, who lives next door.<br><br>According to the affidavit, Marshall acknowledged firing a rifle, but he denied knowing there was a man on the hill when he fired. He told a sheriff&rsquo;s deputy he thought he was shooting a &ldquo;black object that he presumed to be a bear.&rdquo;<br><br>The twenty-seven-year-old Marshall is facing charges of attempted first degree murder and attempted first degree assault. He&rsquo;s being held on $150,000 bond. A judge ordered that in the event he posts bond, he&rsquo;s not to have any contact with Pinnacol Assurance.</div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The biggest impediment to conducting successful surveillance]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/06/the-biggest-impediment-to-conducting-successful-surveillance.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/06/the-biggest-impediment-to-conducting-successful-surveillance.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:00:00 +1000</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfabrisbane.com/1/post/2009/06/the-biggest-impediment-to-conducting-successful-surveillance.html</guid><description><![CDATA[I imagine a lot of investigators doing insurance surveillance work would have quite a few ideas about what exactly is the biggest impediment to conducting successful surveillance. Theses might include: -Insufficient budgetsUnskilled operatorsNot having the right equipmentPoor instructions from the clientBadly targeted surveillance The list is almost endless.In my ho [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">I imagine a lot of investigators doing insurance surveillance work would have quite a few ideas about what exactly is the biggest impediment to conducting successful surveillance. Theses might include: -<br><ul><li>Insufficient budgets</li><li>Unskilled operators</li><li>Not having the right equipment</li><li>Poor instructions from the client</li><li>Badly targeted surveillance </li></ul>The list is almost endless.<br><br>In my honest opinion, none of the above items rates as the number 1 factor when it comes to impeding a successful surveillance assignment. The number one spot is&hellip;..</div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />Due-by dates!</span><br /><br />Due-by dates that are set at a ridiculously short turn-around times are designed by their very nature to produce unsuccessful outcomes. We have a situation here in Queensland where one of the state&rsquo;s biggest insurers has set a report-by time of 14 days from when the instructions are first issued. This includes matters in regional areas where there is often a severe lack of experienced and capable surveillance operators. To put the size of Queensland into perspective for overseas readers, Texas in the US can fit into Queensland two and a half times.<br /><br />It will take at least one or two days to initially process the matter (database entry, open/create files, etc.) and conduct the preliminary searches necessary before a surveillance request can even be sent to a surveillance operator. Then there is the reporting on the other end, firstly by the surveillance operator and then the agency who will submit the final report. At best, this leaves around 10 days for the operator to complete the entire assignment.<br /><br />An operator in a regional area (good ones are few and far between) might not be able to commence the matter straight away due to other job commitments, illness or a number of other reasons. This then starts to decrease the viable time-frame in which the matter can be completed even further. Weekends are often particularly worthwhile surveillance periods, but with a 14 day turn-around, there is now only one weekend available to use &ndash; that is if another matter does not specifically require weekend surveillance. The surveillance operator has no choice but to conduct surveillance on a matter with a short turn-around time simply when he can fit it in &ndash; not when surveillance should be conducted. If he has a two or three day window of opportunity to complete the assignment, then those are the only days he can work on the matter. If the surveillance budget is for 20 hours of observations and there are two days to complete the matter, then the surveillance operator simply has to put in around two ten-hour days, whether the matter requires it or not.<br /><br />Imagine a scenario where the surveillance operative learns the surveillance subject is ill &ndash; and therefore unlikely to be active. Too bad. He simply has to put the hours in during the days that are available, regardless of whether this is the correct thing to do as far as a surveillance strategy is concerned.<br /><br />You might be asking, &ldquo;But surely an extension of the due-by date can be requested to better accommodate a successful result.&rdquo; Well, this particular insurer does allow extensions to the due-by date, but here&rsquo;s the rub. One of their statistic figures, whereby they determine who is and who isn&rsquo;t performing to their expectations, is (you guessed it) how well that agency complies with their due-by dates. Compliance with due-by dates is, of and by itself, an extremely poor measure of quality when it comes to surveillance matters. Surveillance by its very nature is (or should be) a fluid investigation that should always properly target only the most likely times a surveillance subject will be engaged in activity of potential worth. If this means delaying the commencement or completion of a surveillance matter, then so be it.<br /><br />This insurer has now created a situation whereby claims are being time-managed rather than actually being &ldquo;investigated&rdquo; as they should be.<br /><br />Jarris Fuller</div>  ]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>

